allegro
38
31 and 32
Because the numerals fit with the watch. Which, unfortunately, cannot be said about those with raised markers and numerals at 3, 6, 9 and 12. On those (alas, majority of) dials the numerals don't fit aesthetically. They are much too small and too neat for the otherwise masculine impression of the layout. This is balanced on no. 31, where there are no strong hour markers to compete with.
Otherwise there is a lot good to be said about Mr Habring and his excellent watches.
Have you seen all these DIAL variations from HABRING²?
(Broadband on notebook recommended, and please allow about 20 seconds for all the pictures to load) Took some pictures of the dials which HABRING² has prepared on a sample-board when Maria Kristina & Richard Habring were in town last quarter. They should ...
Careful
or the horology police will hear, a tourbillon isn't actually a complication :-P A
Very cool!
Thanks for the post, Kong! I'd love to see all these variations in person! The MOP dials are very elegant, as are the enamel. I think the blue and copper galvanic metal dials are my favorite at the moment! Cheers, Daos
Know you will response ...
Hi Daos Thanks for your inputs. Was wondering where were you. Hmm, so it was ' radio internet silence' for two weeks Kong
Lack of internet was horrible!
I never realized how dependent I am on the internet at home. There were times when I wanted to look up a customer service phone number for the utilities or cable provider, etc. or find directions to somewhere and I had a hard time since I wasn't able to g...
31 and 32
Because the numerals fit with the watch. Which, unfortunately, cannot be said about those with raised markers and numerals at 3, 6, 9 and 12. On those (alas, majority of) dials the numerals don't fit aesthetically. They are much too small and too neat for...
