| Not logged in | Login | Create Account | Help | | Forum Search |
Chopard |
List All |
Top Level | Most Recent : (posts) *| FAV
By: TicTac (registered) PM
Posts: 8 |
Chopard LUC Tech Twist
Jul 13 2008,09:26 AM A couple of pictures ot the Tech Twist. It has an amazing openworked dial, with multiple layers. There's a comparison pic between the standard Tech Twist and the Sincere HH Tech Twist. Enjoy! Chopard LUC Tech Twist Chopard LUC Tech Twist Close-up of the multi-layered openworked dial Another view of the the multi-layered openworked dial Yet another view of the the multi-layered openworked dial Close-up of the movement View from the back Chopard (LE 250) (on the left) vs Sincere (LE 100) (on the right) Chopard (LE 250) vs Sincere (LE 100) - Can you spot the differences? Sincere movement has a blackened treatment - White letterings on black as compared to black on silver for the Chopard version |
By: Kong (registered) PM
Posts: 1903 |
Tic Tac, Congrats! Thank you for ...
Jul 13 2008,10:12 AM
taking time to share with us the beautiful pics. |
By: TicTac (registered) PM
Posts: 8 |
How I wish both were mine....
Aug 21 2008,06:31 AM
... one's mine, and the other belongs to a friend who kindly allowed me to take some side-by-side comparison shots. The watch is very well-designed and contemporary, as opposed to the more traditional looking watches (which I also like, but which may not appeal to ladies). It goes well different attires... I wear this to the office with a shirt/tie & also on the weekends in jeans. I'm also into skeletons & open-worked watches, and so it fits in nicely with my other watches (e.g., Corum Golden Bridge, Corum Bubble Skeleton, De Bethune DBS). Anyway, thanks for looking & all the comments. :P |
By: TicTac (registered) PM
Posts: 8 | |
By: Jacky (registered) PM
Posts: 3085 |
Pretty watch....
Jul 20 2008,00:40 AM
Congrats on it and thanks for sharing the photos. Very nice shots all of them
Regards |
By: Kong (registered) PM
Posts: 1903 |
Well said Jacky... the ladies love Tech Twist though. [nt]
Jul 22 2008,12:35 PM No message body |