| Not logged in | Login | Create Account | Help | | Forum Search |
Horological Meandering |
List All |
Top Level | Most Recent : (posts) *| FAV
|
By: jasny (registered) PM
Posts: 314 |
With the two recent auctions of the Journe and Dufour Repeater/Soneries,
May 13 2008,05:31 AM
there has been some talk in the different fora about repeater movements. I know that there have been some comments that in house might be prefferable, and frankly I must admit, I am an in house movement person. However, with repeaters I might deviate from this preference. Our beloved CL pointed out to me that with a Patek, Vacheron, or Kari you get a more conventional movement that is more easily serviceable. This has me thinking, how many watchmakers can actually service a Dufour or Journe Grande and Petite Sonnerie? Or even a Kari decimal repeater for that matter? I can just imagine a watchmaker having a Dufour all disassembled on his bench, parts everywhere, and he is thinking WTF did I get myself into? |
By: amanico (registered) PM
Posts: 6744 |
Interesting, Jasny
May 13 2008,07:19 AM
But you can generalize the question to other complications or " exotic " movements... The Service of a watch can be the last fight in horology... How many new companies can be sure to be able to exist, furthermore, to service their watches in 10 or 20 years??? That bmakes me think, too... Best, and waiting for others inputs about this topic! Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2008-05-13 07:19:34 |
By: DonCorson (registered) PM
Posts: 548 |
I'd bet...
May 13 2008,10:08 AM
that if you can service one grande sonnerie you can service another. |
|
By: jasny (registered) PM
Posts: 314 |
And Don lets not forget the Journe system of stopping the ringing when the power is low.
May 13 2008,10:50 AM
|
|
By: nickd (registered) PM
Posts: 1100 |
Not many competent people...
May 14 2008,03:51 AM
I once investigated this for a friend who owns a very nice VC pocketwatch chronograph minute repeater. After some searching, my watchmaker pointed me at someone he'd studied watchmaking with who now worked for the SAV of a top-end maker, but had previously done servicing/repairing/restoring complications for an auction house, and so had seen far more repeaters than most watchmakers. His comment was that there's a huge difference between being able to on the one hand dissassemble, clean and reassemble a repeater and on the other being able to adjust it and set it up so that it will function correctly without excessive wear etc. Given the number of poorly set-up repeaters he'd seen, he was doubtful whether even the makers had the skilled staff required to get it 100% right everytime. He reckoned that skilled, knowledgeable repeater experts were far less common than people who knew tourbillons. Personally, I think that servicing complications is going to become a very expensive nightmare in the next decade, especially with exotic materials etc, and that some of these ultra-complications will turn out to be white elephant vault-queens that change hands for astronomical prices at auction but are never used and never serviced. nick |
|
By: jasny (registered) PM
Posts: 314 |
Well it certainly makes sense that there is a huge difference between
May 14 2008,05:09 AM
|