Horological Meandering |  List All |  Top Level | Most Recent : (posts) *| FAV 

We are PuristS, aren't we?
May 11, 2008,16:59 PM - (view entire thread)	By: ling5hk (registered)  |  PM Posts: 193

It has one of the top quality movements, ceramic case (like EOD and some of the ROO only has ceramic bazel) and good design.  Of course, it is relatively cheaper than AP.

Why would we be bothered by the name of "Chanel"?  After all, we are not buying it for resale value.

And with such a good movement and corrosive proof case material and affordable price, it looks like this is the watch to be considered to keep for the next generation.

Regards

Ling

Respond to this post | 

 Main Post So you like the AP movement but not the ROO case.......  - MTF (registered) on May 11th, 2008-10:27 
 We are PuristS, aren't we?  - ling5hk (registered) on May 11th, 2008-16:59 
 Very Interesting Indeed  - JediWatchFool (registered) on May 11th, 2008-19:31 
 Exactly my point: Some don't like the Offshore case  - MTF (registered) on May 11th, 2008-19:52 
 And BTW, it's a real looker too.  - DonCorson (registered) on May 12th, 2008-01:47 
 I'll second that! (nt)  - mkt33 (registered) on May 12th, 2008-19:24 
 The movement looks pretty good. Thanks for the update, MTF. [nt]  - Jacky (registered) on May 12th, 2008-22:26