Ulysse Nardin

Horological Meandering  | News Central  | Audemars Piguet New  | Blancpain  | Breguet  | Bulgari New  | Cartier New  | Chopard  | Girard Perregaux  | Glashütte Original  | Jaeger-LeCoultre  | Jaquet Droz  | F.P. Journe  | A.Lange & Söhne  | Richard Mille  | Montblanc  | Omega  | Officine Panerai  | Patek Philippe  | Piaget  | Rolex  | Ulysse Nardin  | Vacheron Constantin  | Harry Winston  | AHCI and independent haute horlogerie  | TimeOut  | WristScan  | Collectors Market  | Help Desk  |  |  Mobile/PDA

Not logged in | Login | Create Account | Help | Forum Search

Ulysse Nardin  |  List All |  Top Level | Most Recent : (posts) *FAV tick

Reminds me of a doctor I consulted during my army time ....

Feb 02, 2010,06:51 AM - (view entire thread)
Avatar
By: Marcus Hanke (registered) [UN Moderator] 
PM
Posts: 7108

I asked him: "When I jump up, after having rested without movement for a long while, and at the same time turn to the other side, I feel a sudden, sharp pain here and here." His reply was simple: "Then don't do this!"

Well, of course this little anecdote does not mean I don't take your worries serious. Yet you have to imagine yourself that the movement of the hour hand by the GMT pushers and by the crown involves two different sets of wheels, that normally operate separated from each other. Pulling out the crown into the "time setting" position engages one of the mechanisms, which of course interferes with the other one, should the latter be employed as well.

More or less the same happens in your first example: the date display mechanism engaged by the movement's hour wheel is a different from the mechanism of the date quick-setting. Mixing these two can result in damage of either of them, unless you introduce a mechanism that comletely decouples the date wheels from the base movement, while the quick-setting function is used. Moser did this, but they are the only company I am aware of.

Regards,
Marcus

Respond to this post | 



PuristSPro.com Home Page - Visit PURISTSPRO V2